Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 700 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a speed of 900 MHz on this model. It features 96 SPUs as well as 16 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 240, which features a core clock frequency of 730 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 320 SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
GeForce GT 430 60 Watts
Difference: 30 Watts (100%)

Memory Bandwidth

Both cards have the exact same memory bandwidth, so theoretically they should perform exactly the same. (explain)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 240 is a lot (more or less 30%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GT 430. (explain)

Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 430 11200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 3400 (30%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R7 240 is superior to the GeForce GT 430, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3040 (109%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2010 October 2013
Code Name GF108 Oland PRO
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 96 320
Texture Mapping Units 16 20
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 585 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R7 240”
руслан says:

добрый вечер! будте добры посоветуйте купить р7 240 4gb в место gt430?будет ли р7 на много больше давать фпс?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield