Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 7750 vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The Radeon HD 7750 comes with a clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1125 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 512 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 240, which features clock speeds of 730 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 2048 MB of DDR3 memory. It features 320 SPUs as well as 20 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
Difference: 25 Watts (83%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon HD 7750 should be a lot faster than the Radeon R7 240 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 43200 (150%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7750 will be much (more or less 75%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11000 (75%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 7750 is much (about 119%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 240, and should be able to handle higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 6960 (119%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon HD 7750 Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year February 2012 October 2013
Code Name Cape Verde Pro Oland PRO
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 800 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 4500 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 55 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 72000 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25600 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12800 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 512 320
Texture Mapping Units 32 20
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR5 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1500 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.1 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]