Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Geforce GTX 670 vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

The Geforce GTX 670 has a GPU core clock speed of 915 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 1500 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 1344 SPUs, 112 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Geforce GTX 760, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this specific model. It features 1152 SPUs along with 96 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Both cards have the same power consumption.

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Geforce GTX 760 should perform a little bit faster than the Geforce GTX 670 overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 670 192000 MB/sec
Difference: 256 (0%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 670 will be a small bit (more or less 9%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

Geforce GTX 670 102480 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 8400 (9%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 is a little bit (about 7%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 670, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 670 29280 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2080 (7%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Geforce GTX 670

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model Geforce GTX 670 Geforce GTX 760
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year May 2012 June 2013
Code Name GK104 GK104
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 915 MHz 980 MHz
Shader Speed 915 MHz 980 MHz
Memory Speed 1500 MHz (6000 MHz effective) 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 1344 1152
Texture Mapping Units 112 96
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 170 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 192000 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 102480 Mtexels/sec 94080 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 29280 Mpixels/sec 31360 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

3 Responses to “Geforce GTX 670 vs Geforce GTX 760”
Diego says:
What About the EVGA GTX 760 SC Edition?, is this HWcompare just with the reference models?
Greetings!
izak says:
Just baught the msi 760 twin frozr, I am very satisvied with it's performance :)
Aymon says:
Bought a GTX 760 twin frozr too, it's very good, changed from a EVGA 550ti!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree