GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Geforce GTX 760, which comes with core speeds of 980 MHz on the GPU, and 1502 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		3434 points
	Difference: 2489 (72%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Geforce GTX 760		13 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		10 Mh/s
	Difference: 3 (30%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		110 Watts
Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
	Difference: 60 Watts (55%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Geforce GTX 760 should perform much faster than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 105856 (123%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 will be quite a bit (more or less 58%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		59392 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 34688 (58%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 760 is quite a bit (approximately 111%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		14848 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 16512 (111%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.