 |
 |
Submit Benchmarks!
Geforce GTX 760 vs Geforce GTX 770
Intro
The Geforce GTX 760 uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this particular model. It features 1152 SPUs along with 96 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare that to the Geforce GTX 770, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1046 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1753 MHz on this specific card. It features 1536 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
170 Watts |
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
230 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Geforce GTX 770 should theoretically be a little bit faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
224384 MB/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
192256 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Geforce GTX 770 will be much (about 42%) more effective at AF than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
133888 Mtexels/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
94080 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 770 is the winner, not by a very large margin though. (explain)| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
33472 Mpixels/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
31360 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Geforce GTX 760Amazon.com
|
Geforce GTX 770Amazon.com
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Geforce GTX 760 | Geforce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | June 2013 | May 2013 |
| Code Name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 980 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 6008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 170 watts | 230 watts |
| Bandwidth | 192256 MB/sec | 224384 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 94080 Mtexels/sec | 133888 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 31360 Mpixels/sec | 33472 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1152 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 96 | 128 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3540 million | 3540 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.0 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
Comments
3 Responses to “Geforce GTX 760 vs Geforce GTX 770”thanks so much for this information.....
Wow, the GTX770 almost isn't worth the extra price.
Both my GTX760's is currently at 1,294mhz core and 1732mhz mem (6928mhz effective). Though my primay 760 will do 1840mhz (Elpida) (7360mhz effective).
770 has more cuda cores. Really the price to performance just isn't there, same with power. Kinda glad I didn't buy the 770.
The 760 vs 770 isn;'t really worth it, but the 770 vs 780, its bigger jump, so it looks a bit more appealing.
Not a big difference you say? almost double the fps on every game with my 770 compared to my 760. People may want to consider the 970s now but I still prefer a 780