Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Radeon HD 4670 512MB


Intro

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 648 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a speed of 1242 MHz on this model. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 4670 512MB, which comes with clock speeds of 750 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2 memory. It features 320(64x5) SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4670 512MB 70 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 204 Watts
Difference: 134 Watts (191%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 285 1GB should in theory be much superior to the Radeon HD 4670 512MB in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 158976 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4670 512MB 32000 MB/sec
Difference: 126976 (397%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB is a lot (approximately 116%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 4670 512MB. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 51840 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 512MB 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 27840 (116%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 285 1GB is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 20736 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4670 512MB 6000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 14736 (246%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Radeon HD 4670 512MB

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 285 1GB Radeon HD 4670 512MB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 15, 2009 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name G200b RV730 XT
Memory 1024 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 648 MHz 750 MHz
Memory Speed 2484 MHz 2000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 204 watts 70 watts
Bandwidth 158976 MB/sec 32000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 51840 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 20736 Mpixels/sec 6000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 80 32
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR4/GDDR3/DDR3/DDR2
Bus Width 512-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 55 nm
Transistors 1400 million 514 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Radeon HD 4670 512MB

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]