 |
 |
Submit Benchmarks!
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB vs Radeon HD 7770
Intro
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 928 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1350 MHz on this particular card. It features 768 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 7770, which comes with core speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 7770 |
|
80 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB |
|
110 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should perform a little bit faster than the Radeon HD 7770 in general. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB |
|
86400 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 7770 |
|
72000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB is a lot (about 48%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 7770. (explain)| GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB |
|
59392 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 7770 |
|
40000 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7770 is superior to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB, though only just barely. (explain)| Radeon HD 7770 |
|
16000 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB |
|
14848 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GBAmazon.com
|
Radeon HD 7770Amazon.com
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB | Radeon HD 7770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | October 2012 | February 2012 |
| Code Name | GK106 | Cape Verde XT |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 1024 MB |
| Core Speed | 928 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5400 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 110 watts | 80 watts |
| Bandwidth | 86400 MB/sec | 72000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 59392 Mtexels/sec | 40000 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 14848 Mpixels/sec | 16000 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 768 | 640 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 40 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 2540 million | 1500 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 4.2 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!