Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 900 MHz. The DDR3 RAM is set to run at a frequency of 1782 MHz on this specific model. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB, which has core speeds of 928 MHz on the GPU, and 1350 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 768 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 110 Watts
Difference: 45 Watts (69%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB is quite a bit (about 106%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 59392 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30592 (106%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should be just a bit (approximately 3%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 14848 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 448 (3%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 October 2012
Code Name GK107 GK106
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 928 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz 928 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 5400 MHz
Unified Shaders 384 768
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 110 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 59392 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 14848 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing