Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 features a clock speed of 900 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 1782 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 384 SPUs, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB, which features a clock speed of 928 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1350 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 768 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 110 Watts
Difference: 45 Watts (69%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB is 52% faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 in general, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should be a lot (about 106%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 59392 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30592 (106%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB is a bit (approximately 3%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, and should be able to handle higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 14848 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 448 (3%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 October 2012
Code Name GK107 GK106
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 928 MHz
Memory Speed 3564 MHz 5400 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 110 watts
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 59392 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 14848 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 768
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1300 million 2540 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]