Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 640 DDR3 features a GPU core speed of 900 MHz, and the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM is set to run at 1782 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 384 Stream Processors, 32 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB, which features GPU core speed of 928 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1350 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 768 Stream Processors, 64 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 640 DDR3 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 110 Watts
Difference: 45 Watts (69%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 57024 MB/sec
Difference: 29376 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB will be quite a bit (about 106%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 59392 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 28800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30592 (106%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB will be just a bit (about 3%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 640 DDR3, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB 14848 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 640 DDR3 14400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 448 (3%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 640 DDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 640 DDR3 GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 2012 October 2012
Code Name GK107 GK106
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 900 MHz 928 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz 928 MHz
Memory Speed 1782 MHz (3564 MHz effective) 1350 MHz (5400 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 384 768
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 65 watts 110 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 57024 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 28800 Mtexels/sec 59392 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14400 Mpixels/sec 14848 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree