Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti


The GeForce GTX 650 Ti features a GPU clock speed of 928 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1350 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 768 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, which features clock speeds of 915 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1344 SPUs as well as 112 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti 110 Watts
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 150 Watts
Difference: 40 Watts (36%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti should in theory be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 144000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Difference: 57600 (67%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti will be much (about 73%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 102480 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 59392 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 43088 (73%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti should be much (more or less 48%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and will be capable of handling higher resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 21960 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti 14848 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7112 (48%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year October 2012 August 2012
Code Name GK106 GK104
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 928 MHz 915 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 6000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 110 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 144000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 59392 Mtexels/sec 102480 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14848 Mpixels/sec 21960 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 768 1344
Texture Mapping Units 64 112
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 192-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 2540 million 3540 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield