Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) vs GeForce GTX 650

Intro

The GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 650 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a speed of 970 MHz on this card. It features 128 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 650, which comes with core speeds of 1058 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) 135 Watts
Difference: 71 Watts (111%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 650, in theory, should be much faster than the GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) 62080 MB/sec
Difference: 17920 (29%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) will be a lot (more or less 23%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) 41600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 7744 (23%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is superior to the GeForce 8800 GTS (G92), by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) 10400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 6528 (63%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce 8800 GTS (G92)

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) GeForce GTX 650
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year Dec 2007 September 2012
Code Name G92 GK107
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 512 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 650 MHz 1058 MHz
Shader Speed 1625 MHz 1058 MHz
Memory Speed 970 MHz (1940 MHz effective) 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 128 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 32
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 135 watts 64 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 62080 MB/sec 80000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41600 Mtexels/sec 33856 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 10400 Mpixels/sec 16928 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) vs GeForce GTX 650”
Anonymous says:
thanks....really usefull information

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree