Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 650

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a frequency of 999 MHz on this particular card. It features 192 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 650, which features core clock speeds of 1058 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 384 SPUs as well as 32 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 118 Watts (184%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 should be 40% quicker than the GeForce GTX 650 in general, due to its greater bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Difference: 31888 (40%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 is a small bit (more or less 9%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 3008 (9%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is the winner, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 800 (5%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 GeForce GTX 650
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 16, 2008 September 2012
Code Name G200 GK107
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1058 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 182 watts 64 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 80000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 36864 Mtexels/sec 33856 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16928 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 192 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1300 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 650”
randy says:

The GTX 260 is essentially the same as GTX 650, the advantage the GTX 650 has is Directx 11

SeriousJ says:

Looking at the gtx 650's power consumption, this has to be a very effective card for casual gaming deliviering 260's performance. (+directx 11.1)

PAul says:

lol 650 for lyfe!

Dark_Razar says:

Pros e cons of the two cards:

GTX 260:
- It is faster in general.
- A lot more Cheaper than the GTX 650 (You can save more than 60$).

GTX 650
- DirectX 11.
- Less Power Consuption.

It's not a real comparison, just because the GTX 260 is pretty old... But it's still a good graphic card.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]