Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 650

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 650, which features core speeds of 1058 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 384 SPUs along with 32 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 138 Watts (216%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should be 40% quicker than the GeForce GTX 650 overall, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Difference: 31888 (40%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a lot (about 22%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 7616 (22%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is superior to the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, though not by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 800 (5%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 GeForce GTX 650
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 16, 2008 September 2012
Code Name G200 GK107
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1058 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 64 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 80000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 33856 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16928 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 384
Texture Mapping Units 72 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1300 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield