Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce GTX 650

Intro

The GeForce GTX 460 features clock speeds of 675 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 768 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 336 SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 24 ROPs.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 650, which comes with GPU clock speed of 1058 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1250 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 Stream Processors, 32 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 86 Watts (134%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 460 should theoretically be a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 650 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Difference: 6400 (8%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 460 will be a bit (more or less 12%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 3944 (12%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 is a better choice, but only just. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 728 (4%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 460

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 460 GeForce GTX 650
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year July 2010 September 2012
Code Name GF104 GK107
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 768 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 675 MHz 1058 MHz
Shader Speed 1350 MHz 1058 MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (3600 MHz effective) 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 336 384
Texture Mapping Units 56 32
Render Output Units 24 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.3
Power (Max TDP) 150 watts 64 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 80000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 37800 Mtexels/sec 33856 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16200 Mpixels/sec 16928 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

3 Responses to “GeForce GTX 460 vs GeForce GTX 650”
zoe says:
I purchased a GEFORCE GT620 on advice from the shop technician. Performance was dismal. An ATI Radeon HD5670 at the same price gives me a bench mark of 7.1 for graphics and gaming graphics. The old faithful GTX which cost a lot more bechmarks in at 7.6 for both tests. The GT620 comes in at 4 for the Graphics and 5.1 for gaming graphics. The GT620 2GB costs $80 and the GT630 4GB $150.
leland says:
v;lfl;vblfclbc;v;fff;dgllfv.cbm,clb,.,b,,blflgfld;gkfld;gd;l;g;dfdgf/bf/.fg//fg;r/rglfgl''r.g;rgl;g.;fg;g/;flg/g/gg.glgld;gf/g;dgfd1234567890-=cvmkfkjjfjjfjfjjjfjjjfjjjjfjjjfjsfuszfsf9-0ifs0u0os0ufosfodfjgk fjjfk fodjdfjsfjjdjjfdjg gkdzg fkfff n jjfjgjd f jsgfjg d fjsgjdjgj fjjsjg fjsfj fksfjsf skhffn fksfkfsfnsjfjfjsifjfjgotiyu5utuyutyuitru39t88rer234883 44343444554w3454555485gkgokkjjjbjhghjjhjhhhxh;jhjkhkdokfiigyj jy jhdohoodoyllkhfkhkkryhkkkhkkkhgtkktiiitiigkgkkgkkkkihiitiriyst[gztipztiztr9iig9r99gitin tjtj tkkhkkhtuyhttootiouotg.ffdfgfmkkkkhhkkhjgj jchgjjhjghmhjnjdffghnmjnmjnghhkkh glelandbjbjjbjjjvjjvbkkjncvnncbncbhhchbhchbhghfhrgffhghfjghfruufufffhhgdgidggdfjgfjgjsjfjfjjfjfjfjfjrfvhfughehfhfeufh giehfr guriabb vvur rrutriqiihruaiRIIRIE RIURRIEHRHRHIHSWHWHFHFH RBFEHHRIWRUVNRHWRHR N RHHWSW HWSRHHR RHWRHQUB EUWRH RHUWRHIRHHAHQHWRHQJRHRHIWEFJERHWEHRHQIQRHQUFDFFDXFCKGKGKOGKGKGDGDFMDMGDGMMGMDGMGMDMGMMGMMGMMHMMDMMGMDMGM,DGDKGFKHJFKGDHKKDGJDKJGKDJGKKDLGJKJDGLKHJD GJDLGJLGDGKDHLDGLDGDLGKLLDK GLKKLFJFKTJGHDFGTYUO;YTGL'TFJVM,VNXVNVKJCKCJKXJXKJVCNVNCNJVCNVCVNJXVVKIHVKCHVCHJJVJHJCDVHJVHZKHVXKCVVJXHVOKDHVDFITRRUYUEUYIEHUEIGUERURUTIRET 9EURTT NMTERIG IR GIRJTH TIGTIGTGEIT ITTIE TEITETIQHTOTG RIETIETNRET OETR I4TITEIR RNI4URHTURUT NIETIETIIETH ITUTEURTUIEUTIETIETUEI TOTIOEOGHFTTYasfhjpl;fgyyyytyl5
leland says:
fjhsnzfcn snmfnsfnndbfvdfx cfnvsndfvnsdngfvbsdnf fnansfbsnfsbdjafjhajdba fnafnsnefn f snfna dfn enf bewbfbhwehrhuhreuhrwusfhrafrb bfb hefgaeh fh hfh fjhsdjf hjfhasehfjsehf hewfjhe jfhwesdfhjesdfhjhe sdhfewueytytutuutuutuhydrut bvvt grbtgwrthyg4ehbhgtuhbfth4urhhgtrhvhbgtgvkhrthhg4etgtrhbrgb5yy5trhybrhtgybgrhvtb54b utfu54y 4tu trierut4tu e4hiygh e5r'ew""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""",lrfhefhvji,jkhujghghhgh fjrfhvju bgtbgfhjbgr brffin0oijbngnjkpo3e-f0pvepgnmvjerfnjorjwehfsdsierdf9vidheruifgue4rfherori4ijriu

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree