Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 650 vs Radeon HD 7850

Intro

The GeForce GTX 650 features a GPU core clock speed of 1058 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1250 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 Stream Processors, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 7850, which has core speeds of 860 MHz on the GPU, and 1200 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1024 SPUs along with 64 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 64 Watts
Radeon HD 7850 130 Watts
Difference: 66 Watts (103%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon HD 7850 should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 650 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 7850 153600 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 80000 MB/sec
Difference: 73600 (92%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7850 should be much (more or less 63%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 650. (explain)

Radeon HD 7850 55040 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 33856 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 21184 (63%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7850 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon HD 7850 27520 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 16928 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10592 (63%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 650

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Radeon HD 7850

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 650 Radeon HD 7850
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year September 2012 March 2012
Code Name GK107 Pitcairn Pro
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1058 MHz 860 MHz
Shader Speed 1058 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective) 1200 MHz (4800 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 384 1024
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.1 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 64 watts 130 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 80000 MB/sec 153600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33856 Mtexels/sec 55040 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16928 Mpixels/sec 27520 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree