Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

A Question

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon HD 7850

Intro

The GeForce GTX 660 features a GPU clock speed of 980 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1502 MHz through a 192-bit bus. It also features 960 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 24 Raster Operation Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 7850, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 860 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1200 MHz on this specific model. It features 1024 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7850 130 Watts
GeForce GTX 660 140 Watts
Difference: 10 Watts (8%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 7850 should in theory be a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 660 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 7850 153600 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 660 144192 MB/sec
Difference: 9408 (7%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 660 should be quite a bit (about 42%) better at AF than the Radeon HD 7850. (explain)

GeForce GTX 660 78400 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7850 55040 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 23360 (42%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7850 is a better choice, but not by far. (explain)

Radeon HD 7850 27520 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 660 23520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4000 (17%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 660

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7850

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 660 Radeon HD 7850
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2012 March 2012
Code Name GK106 Pitcairn Pro
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 980 MHz 860 MHz
Shader Speed 980 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 6008 MHz 4800 MHz
Unified Shaders 960 1024
Texture Mapping Units 80 64
Render Output Units 24 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.3 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 140 watts 130 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 144192 MB/sec 153600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 78400 Mtexels/sec 55040 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 23520 Mpixels/sec 27520 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

16 Responses to “GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon HD 7850”
Xshad0w says:

i have sapphire 7850 2gb oc but gtx 660 better

paratha says:

evga gtx660 is alot better than 7850.Gtx660 beat 7850 easily

Aero says:

I bought the GTX 660 for 1366x768, and easily touched 60fps at all games

Bangladeshi Ranjan says:

Bangladeshi Ranjan says:

Can anyone ans is texal rate so important?

burakgon says:

I have a 7850 OC. That's dumb. 660 is much and much better! Even for linux.

jim says:

660 or 7850 oc...

jovancecar says:

is amd better on 1680 X 1080

eng_borek says:

as an engineer i'd say all those tests are more or less biased.

from a sticktly technical point of view hd7850 should be a much more powerful card

it's not only about the gpu /memory clocks

hd 7850 is much more customizable and OC-efficient.

lewis says:

I have the 660 and my friend has the 7850, when we compared frames on games such as bf3 and wow (using same processor) the 660 came out on top by about 5 fps

Joshua A. says:

I think the saddest part about this benchmark is, AMD's 7850 is $100 cheaper.

Zhao says:

gtx 660 is in stock better than the 7850 in stock clock, but when it comes to overclocking, the 7850 has a little advantage overall. Still nvidia has physx built in :)

qadqe says:

me cago en tus muertos

Evans Young says:

i won the gtx 660 evga for the win signature 2 edition and its blazing fast.

RedDevil90 says:

Hi,im thinking on buying one of the two.And i just want to know which is better the gtx 660 or the 7850?

killermenpl says:

Which is better if I have AMD A10-5800k APU?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]