Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Geforce GTX 680

Intro

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB features core clock speeds of 648 MHz on the GPU, and 1242 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Geforce GTX 680, which comes with core clock speeds of 1006 MHz on the GPU, and 1502 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1536 SPUs along with 128 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 680 195 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 204 Watts
Difference: 9 Watts (5%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Geforce GTX 680 is 21% faster than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB overall, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 192256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 158976 MB/sec
Difference: 33280 (21%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 is a lot (approximately 148%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 128768 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 51840 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 76928 (148%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 680 is superior to the GeForce GTX 285 1GB, by far. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 32192 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 20736 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11456 (55%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 285 1GB Geforce GTX 680
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 15, 2009 March 2012
Code Name G200b GK104
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 648 MHz 1006 MHz
Shader Speed 1476 MHz 1006 MHz
Memory Speed 1242 MHz (2484 MHz effective) 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 1536
Texture Mapping Units 80 128
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 512-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 204 watts 195 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 158976 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 51840 Mtexels/sec 128768 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 20736 Mpixels/sec 32192 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing