Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs Geforce GTX 680

Intro

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB makes use of a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 648 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a frequency of 1242 MHz on this card. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Geforce GTX 680, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1006 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1502 MHz on this specific card. It features 1536 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 680 195 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 204 Watts
Difference: 9 Watts (5%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Geforce GTX 680 should in theory be a lot better than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB in general. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 192256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 158976 MB/sec
Difference: 33280 (21%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 is a lot (approximately 148%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 128768 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 51840 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 76928 (148%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 680 will be much (more or less 55%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB, and able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Geforce GTX 680 32192 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 20736 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11456 (55%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 680

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 285 1GB Geforce GTX 680
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 15, 2009 March 2012
Code Name G200b GK104
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 648 MHz 1006 MHz
Shader Speed 1476 MHz 1006 MHz
Memory Speed 1242 MHz (2484 MHz effective) 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 1536
Texture Mapping Units 80 128
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 512-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 204 watts 195 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 158976 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 51840 Mtexels/sec 128768 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 20736 Mpixels/sec 32192 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree