Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8500 GT vs Radeon HD 5770

Intro

The GeForce 8500 GT features a GPU core speed of 450 MHz, and the 512 MB of DDR2 memory runs at 400 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 16 Stream Processors, 8 Texture Address Units, and 4 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 5770, which features core clock speeds of 850 MHz on the GPU, and 1200 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 800(160x5) SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8500 GT 45 Watts
Radeon HD 5770 108 Watts
Difference: 63 Watts (140%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon HD 5770 should perform much faster than the GeForce 8500 GT overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 76800 MB/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 64000 (500%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 5770 is quite a bit (about 844%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 8500 GT. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 34000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 3600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30400 (844%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 5770 will be much (about 656%) more effective at AA than the GeForce 8500 GT, and able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 13600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 1800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11800 (656%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce 8500 GT

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Radeon HD 5770

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce 8500 GT Radeon HD 5770
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year April 2007 October 13, 2009
Code Name G86 Juniper XT
Fab Process 80 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16, PCI, PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 450 MHz 850 MHz
Shader Speed 900 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 400 MHz (800 MHz effective) 1200 MHz (4800 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 16 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 8 40
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 45 watts 108 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 12800 MB/sec 76800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 3600 Mtexels/sec 34000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 1800 Mpixels/sec 13600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree