Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8500 GT vs Radeon HD 5770

Intro

The GeForce 8500 GT features clock speeds of 450 MHz on the GPU, and 400 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR2 RAM. It features 16 SPUs along with 8 TAUs and 4 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 5770, which has a clock speed of 850 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1200 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 800(160x5) SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8500 GT 45 Watts
Radeon HD 5770 108 Watts
Difference: 63 Watts (140%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 5770 should in theory perform a lot faster than the GeForce 8500 GT overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 76800 MB/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 64000 (500%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 5770 is much (approximately 844%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce 8500 GT. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 34000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 3600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 30400 (844%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 5770 is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon HD 5770 13600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8500 GT 1800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11800 (656%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8500 GT

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 5770

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 8500 GT Radeon HD 5770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2007 October 13, 2009
Code Name G86 Juniper XT
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 450 MHz 850 MHz
Memory Speed 800 MHz 4800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 45 watts 108 watts
Bandwidth 12800 MB/sec 76800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 3600 Mtexels/sec 34000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 1800 Mpixels/sec 13600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 16 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 8 40
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 80 nm 40 nm
Transistors 210 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16, PCI, PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.1 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]