Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 7750 vs Radeon HD 7950

Intro

The Radeon HD 7750 uses a 28 nm design. ATi has set the core speed at 800 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1125 MHz on this specific card. It features 512 SPUs along with 32 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 7950, which comes with core speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 1536 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1792 SPUs along with 112 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
Radeon HD 7950 200 Watts
Difference: 145 Watts (264%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon HD 7950 should in theory be quite a bit better than the Radeon HD 7750 in general. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 240000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 168000 (233%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7950 is much (about 250%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 89600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 64000 (250%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7950 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 25600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 12800 (100%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 7950

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7950
Manufacturer ATi ATi
Year February 2012 January 2012
Code Name Cape Verde Pro Tahiti Pro
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1536 MB
Core Speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed N/A MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 512 1792
Texture Mapping Units 32 112
Render Output Units 16 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 384-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11.1 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.2
Power (Max TDP) 55 watts 200 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 72000 MB/sec 240000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25600 Mtexels/sec 89600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12800 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree