Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 7750 vs Radeon HD 7950

Intro

The Radeon HD 7750 has a core clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1125 MHz. It also features a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 512 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 7950, which features a GPU core clock speed of 800 MHz, and 1536 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1250 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also is made up of 1792 SPUs, 112 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7750 55 Watts
Radeon HD 7950 200 Watts
Difference: 145 Watts (264%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 7950 should be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 7750 overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 240000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 7750 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 168000 (233%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7950 is quite a bit (more or less 250%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 7750. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 89600 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 25600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 64000 (250%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7950 is superior to the Radeon HD 7750, by far. (explain)

Radeon HD 7950 25600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7750 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 12800 (100%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 7750

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 7950

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 7950
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year February 2012 January 2012
Code Name Cape Verde Pro Tahiti Pro
Memory 1024 MB 1536 MB
Core Speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 4500 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 55 watts 200 watts
Bandwidth 72000 MB/sec 240000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25600 Mtexels/sec 89600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12800 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 512 1792
Texture Mapping Units 32 112
Render Output Units 16 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1500 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.1 DirectX 11.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.2

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]