Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GT 315 vs GeForce GTX 560


The GeForce GT 315 features core clock speeds of 625 MHz on the GPU, and 790 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 48 SPUs as well as 16 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 560, which makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 810 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a speed of 1001 MHz on this particular model. It features 336 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 315 52 Watts
GeForce GTX 560 150 Watts
Difference: 98 Watts (188%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 560 should be much faster than the GeForce GT 315 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 128128 MB/sec
GeForce GT 315 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 102848 (407%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 should be quite a bit (approximately 354%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GT 315. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 45360 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 315 10000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 35360 (354%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 will be quite a bit (approximately 418%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 315, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 25920 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 315 5000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 20920 (418%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 315

GeForce GTX 560

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 315 GeForce GTX 560
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year November 2009 May 2011
Code Name GT216 GF114
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 625 MHz 810 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 4004 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 52 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 128128 MB/sec
Texel Rate 10000 Mtexels/sec 45360 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 5000 Mpixels/sec 25920 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 336
Texture Mapping Units 16 56
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 486 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield