Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 315 vs GeForce GTX 560

Intro

The GeForce GT 315 features clock speeds of 625 MHz on the GPU, and 790 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 48 SPUs as well as 16 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 560, which has clock speeds of 810 MHz on the GPU, and 1001 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 336 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 315 52 Watts
GeForce GTX 560 150 Watts
Difference: 98 Watts (188%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 560 should in theory be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GT 315 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 128128 MB/sec
GeForce GT 315 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 102848 (407%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 should be much (approximately 354%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 315. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 45360 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 315 10000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 35360 (354%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 is quite a bit (about 418%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GT 315, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 25920 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 315 5000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 20920 (418%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 315

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 560

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 315 GeForce GTX 560
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year November 2009 May 2011
Code Name GT216 GF114
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 625 MHz 810 MHz
Shader Speed 1360 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory Speed 790 MHz (1580 MHz effective) 1001 MHz (4004 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 48 336
Texture Mapping Units 16 56
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.2 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 52 watts 150 watts
Shader Model 4.1 5.0
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 128128 MB/sec
Texel Rate 10000 Mtexels/sec 45360 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 5000 Mpixels/sec 25920 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing