 |
 |
|
|
|
Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon HD 5750 1GB
Intro
The Radeon HD 5670 comes with a GPU core speed of 775 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1000 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 400(80x5) SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 5750 1GB, which features GPU clock speed of 700 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1150 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 720(144x5) SPUs, 36 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.
Avatar
| Settings: | Ultra High Quality |
| AA: | 8x |
| AF: | none |
| Resolution: | 1920x1200 |
| Test Machine: | Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source) |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
32 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
25 FPS |
|
|
Battlefield Bad Company 2
| Settings: | High Quality |
| AA: | 4x |
| AF: | 8x |
| Resolution: | 1920x1200 |
| Test Machine: | Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source) |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
26 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
19 FPS |
|
|
Left4Dead 2
| Settings: | Very High |
| AA: | 8x |
| AF: | 16x |
| Resolution: | 1920x1200 |
| Test Machine: | Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source) |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
67 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
49 FPS |
|
|
Mass Effect 2
| Settings: | Maximum Quality |
| AA: | none |
| AF: | 8x |
| Resolution: | 1920x1200 |
| Test Machine: | Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source) |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
70 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
57 FPS |
|
|
Supreme Commander 2
| Settings: | High |
| AA: | 8x |
| AF: | 16x |
| Resolution: | 1920x1200 |
| Test Machine: | Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source) |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
50 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
37 FPS |
|
|
Radeon HD 5750 1GB wins
(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)
When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the Radeon HD 5750 1GB wins overall, by 58 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
245 FPS |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
187 FPS |
|
|
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
61 Watts |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
86 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 5750 1GB should perform a small bit faster than the Radeon HD 5670 in general. (explain)
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
73600 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
64000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 5750 1GB should be a lot (approximately 63%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 5670. (explain)| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
25200 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
15500 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon HD 5750 1GB is a lot (approximately 81%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 5670, and also capable of handling higher resolutions better. (explain)| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
11200 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5670 |
|
6200 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.
Radeon HD 5670Amazon.com
Other US-based stores
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.de
Amazon.fr
|
Radeon HD 5750 1GBAmazon.com
Other US-based stores
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.de
Amazon.fr
|
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 5670 | Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | ATi | ATi |
| Year | January 14, 2010 | October 13, 2009 |
| Code Name | Redwood XT | Juniper LE |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
| Core Speed | 775 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Shader Speed | N/A MHz | (N/A) MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Unified Shaders | 400(80x5) | 720(144x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 20 | 36 |
| Render Output Units | 8 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.2 | OpenGL 3.2 |
| Power (Max TDP) | 61 watts | 86 watts |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Bandwidth | 64000 MB/sec | 73600 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 15500 Mtexels/sec | 25200 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 6200 Mpixels/sec | 11200 Mpixels/sec |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Comments
One Response to “Radeon HD 5670 vs Radeon HD 5750 1GB”It is great that we can take the credit loans and this opens new possibilities.