Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 440 1.5GB vs Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)

Intro

The GeForce GT 440 1.5GB has a core clock frequency of 594 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also features a 192-bit memory bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 144 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 24 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6670 (OEM), which features core clock speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 480 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 440 1.5GB 56 Watts
Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) 63 Watts
Difference: 7 Watts (13%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) should theoretically be a lot superior to the GeForce GT 440 1.5GB overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) 64000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 440 1.5GB 43200 MB/sec
Difference: 20800 (48%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) is much (about 35%) better at AF than the GeForce GT 440 1.5GB. (explain)

Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) 19200 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 440 1.5GB 14256 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 4944 (35%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GT 440 1.5GB is quite a bit (more or less 123%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon HD 6670 (OEM), and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GT 440 1.5GB 14256 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6670 (OEM) 6400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7856 (123%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 440 1.5GB

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 440 1.5GB Radeon HD 6670 (OEM)
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2010 February 2011
Code Name GF106 Turks
Memory 1536 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 594 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 56 watts 63 watts
Bandwidth 43200 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 14256 Mtexels/sec 19200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14256 Mpixels/sec 6400 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 144 480
Texture Mapping Units 24 24
Render Output Units 24 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1170 million 715 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]